Need help with your Discussion

Get a timely done, PLAGIARISM-FREE paper
from our highly-qualified writers!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

Week 6 Assignment: Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

Week 6 Assignment: Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

Week 6 Assignment: Reading Research Literature (RRL) Worksheet

Question Description

Reading, understanding, and appreciating original nursing research literature is essential for evidence-based practice (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018).

Purpose

This assignment provides a learning activity for students to read an original research study and complete a worksheet to demonstrate understanding of the study purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, limitations, conclusions, and the importance of reading research literature.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4, 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)

Assignment Directions:

    1. Read over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric.
    2. Review the following link which contains a tutorial for your Week 6 Assignment. Click here for transcript. (Links to an external site.)https://lms.courselearn.net/lms/video/player.html?video=0_jhxsfia6
    3. Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet (Links to an external site.).
    4. Download or access the required article. The required article must be used. de Araujo, D. D., Silva, D. V. A., Rodrigues, C. A. O., Silva, P. O., Macieira, T. G. R., & Chianca, T. C. M. (2019). Effectiveness of nursing interventions to prevent dry eye in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 28(4), 299–306. Retrieved from https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137294247&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)
    5. You must use the grading rubric to ensure you are meeting all grading criteria of the worksheet.
    6. You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.). Click on the envelope at the top of the page.
    7. Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting.
    8. Submit the completed Reading Research Literature Worksheet to the Week 6 Assignment.

Reminder

Before preparing your assignment, please review this Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.) resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AAC…

Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). Quality and safety education for nurses competencies. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/#e…

Rubric

NR439 Reading Research Literature Worksheet Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the StudyUsing information from the required article and mostly your words, thoroughly summarize the purpose of the study. Describe what the study is about. Provide details.

30.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

26.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

24.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

11.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of Research & the DesignUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the description of the type of research and the design of the study. Include how it supports the purpose (aim or intent) of the study. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSampleUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize the population (sample) for the study; include key characteristics, sample size, sampling technique. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData CollectionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one data that was collected and how the data was collected from the study. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData AnalysisUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the data analysis/ tests performed or one method of data analysis from the study; include what you know/learned about the descriptive or statistical test or data analysis method. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitationsUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one limitation reported in the study. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings/DiscussionUsing information from the required article and your own words, summarize one of the authors’ findings/discussion reported in the study. Include one interesting detail you learned from reading the study. Provide details.

20.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

18.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

16.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

8.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReading Research LiteratureSummarize why it is important for you to read and understand research literature. Summarize what you learned from completing the reading research literature activity worksheet. Provide details.

30.0 pts

Thoroughly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Excellent details are provided.

26.0 pts

Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details.

24.0 pts

Minimally summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided.

11.0 pts

Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first the column. Vague details are provided.

0.0 pts

All criteria from the first column are missing.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar

10.0 pts

Excellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. No errors or 1-2 errors noted.

6.0 pts

Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted.

4.0 pts

Fair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted.

3.0 pts

Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted.

0.0 pts

Very poor writing, mechanics, and organization. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences

10.0 pts

Excellent APA in-text formatting with no errors. Uses mostly your own words with no more than two direct quotes.

5.0 pts

Good APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted.

4.0 pts

Fair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting.

3.0 pts

Poor APA formatting with many errors noted.

0.0 pts

Very poor APA with errors noted throughout.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired RRL Worksheet and Required Article Use

0.0 pts

0 points deducted Required RRL Worksheet used for this assignment and Required Article used for this assignment. 0 points deducted

0.0 pts

20 points (10%) deducted Required RRL Worksheet NOT used and/or Required Article NOT used for this assignment results in a deduction of 20 points (10%). 20 points deducted

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction

0.0 pts

0 point deduction

Submitted on time

0.0 pts

Not submitted on time – Points deducted

1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late

0.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

We Can Write It for You! Enjoy 20% OFF on This Order. Use Code SAVE20

Stuck with your Assignment?

Enjoy 20% OFF Today
Use code SAVE20