week 4 401 assignment

Question Description

Unit 4 Assignment – Evaluating & Reporting Quality of Care

Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 85
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Instructions:

Health care organizations spend time, money, and resources gathering data relating to a patient’s experience, but how should that data be used? For this assignment, you will assume the role of a practice manager.

Scenario:

As the practice manager for ABC Clinic, you have gathered a significant amount of data from patient experiences, to chronic condition management outcomes, and many other data points in between. You plan to make a proposal at your next all-staff meeting, proposing the publication of the clinic’s data.

Respond to the following points as a means of preparing for the meeting:

What data sets will you suggest for publication? Provide a thorough rationale for each selection.
What data sets will you advise be used only internally (not for publication), why?
In bullet point format, list five questions you expect to receive from your staff (this includes clinical and non-clinical staff). In italics, provide your response to each question.
If approved by the leadership team to proceed with publication, what platform(s) will you use to share the data? (i.e. how you will ensure the information reaches your target audience). Briefly describe your rationale for this selection.
Include a minimum of two scholarly sources on a separate reference page; APA format should be followed throughout.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

Proposal in a Word document (.doc) or PDF

Rubric

HC401 – Unit 4 Assignment

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

30.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

27.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

24.0 pts

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

21.0 pts

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

18.0 pts

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P

40.0 pts

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

36.0 pts

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

32.0 pts

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

28.0 pts

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

24.0 pts

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

5.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}

week 4 401 assignment

week 4 401 assignment

week 4 401 assignment

Question Description

Unit 4 Assignment – Evaluating & Reporting Quality of Care

Instructions:

Scenario:

Submit:

Rubric

Our Service Charter

How It Works

Our Advantages

Useful Links