Cervical Cancer Screening
Question Description
- COMPLETE? (not met)
DOES THE PROSPECTUS CONTAIN ALL THE REQUIRED ELEMENTS? REFER TO THE ANNOTATED OUTLINE TO SEE THE REQUIRED PARTS OF THE DOCTORAL STUDY PROSPECTUS DOCUMENT.
COMMENTS:IF NOT MET, WHICH ITEMS ARE MISSING? - JUSTIFIED? (not Met)
IS EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT THIS PROBLEM IS SIGNIFICANT TO THE DISCIPLINE AND/OR PROFESSIONAL FIELD? THE PROSPECTUS SHOULD PROVIDE RELEVANT STATISTICS AND EVIDENCE, DOCUMEN TABLE DISCREPANCIES, AND OTHER SCHOLARLY FACTS THAT POINT TO THE SIGNIFICANCE AND URGENCY OF THE PROBLEM.
COMMENTS: IF NOT MET, IN WHAT AREAS IS ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE NEEDED? - GROUNDED? (not met)
IS THE PROBLEM FRAMED TO ENABLE THE RESEARCHER TO EITHER BUILD UPON OR COUNTER THE PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED FINDINGS ON THE TOPIC? FOR MOST FIELDS, GROUNDING INVOLVES ARTICULATING THE PROBLEM WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A THEORETICAL BASE OR CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. ALTHOUGH MANY APPROACHES CAN GROUND A STUDY IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENT IS THAT THE PROBLEM IS FRAMED SUCH THAT THE NEW FINDINGS WILL HAVE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PREVIOUS FINDINGS.
COMMENTS: IF NOT MET, WHAT OTHER THEORIES OR FRAMEWORKS MIGHT BE MORE APPROPRIATE? - 5. ORIGINAL? (not met)
DOES THIS STUDY HAVE POTENTIAL TO MAKE AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? THE PROBLEM MUST BE AN AUTHENTIC “PUZZLE” THAT NEEDS SOLVING, NOT MERELY A TOPIC THAT THE RESEARCHER FINDS INTERESTING. ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM SHOULD RESULT IN AN ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD OR DISCIPLINE.
COMMENTS: IF NOT MET, HOW COULD THE STUDY MAKE A MORE ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION? - 7. FEASIBLE?(not met)
CAN A SYSTEMATIC METHOD OF INQUIRY BE USED TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM; AND DOES THE APPROACH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM WHILE CONSIDERING POTENTIAL RISKS AND BURDENS PLACED ON RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS? THE TENTATIVE METHODOLOGY DEMONSTRATED THAT THE RESEARCHER HAS CONSIDERED THE OPTIONS FOR INQUIRY AND HAS SELECTED AN APPROACH THAT HAS POTENTIAL TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM.
COMMENTS: IF NOT MET, WHAT OTHER APPROACHES TO RESEARCH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED? - 8. ALIGNED?(not met)
DO THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROSPECTUS ALIGN OVERALL? THE NATURE OF THE STUDY SHOULD ALIGN WITH THE PROBLEM, RESEARCH QUESTIONS, AND TENTATIVE APPROACHES TO INQUIRY.
COMMENTS:IF NO, IN WHAT WAYS COULD ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT BE BETTER ALIGNED? - 9. OBJECTIVE? (not met)
IS THE TOPIC APPROACHED IN AN OBJECTIVE MANNER? THE FRAMING OF THE PROBLEM SHOULD NOT REVEAL BIAS OR PRESENT A FOREGONE CONCLUSION. EVEN IF THE RESEARCHER HAS A STRONG OPINION ON THE EXPECTED FINDINGS, THE RESEARCHER MUST MAXIMIZE SCHOLARLY OBJECTIVITY BY FRAMING THE PROBLEM IN THE CONTEXT OF A SYSTEMATIC INQUIRY THAT PERMITS MULTIPLE POSSIBLE CONCLUSIONS.
COMMENTS: IF NOT MET, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POINTS OF SUBJECTIVITY.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."